Should performance enhancing drugs be allowed in professional sports?

In the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, NY, a baseball with an asterisk is one of the main attractions. It represents Barry Bonds’ record breaking 756th career home run, but the asterisk commemorates the controversial use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs), steroids, and other substances that helped Bonds and others break numerous records and compete at their physical peak. But baseball isn’t the only sport where PEDs are commonly used by athletes to get ahead in competition. In the Olympics, and at the highest levels of athletics, PEDs are a controversial subject and issue for sports organizations around the world.

investigate

Teachers

Download the teacher's guide to follow along.

An interview with one of the NYT reporters who broke the allegations of Grigory Rodchenkov, a former Russian anti-doping agent, who says that Russian athletes were using PEDs and doping at the 2014 Olympics.

Kayaker Admits To Setting Up A Rival Who Was Banned For Doping

The story of a Japanese kayaker who spiked his rival's drink with steroids to get him banned from competition.

Should Testosterone Be Regulated in Female Athletes?
From NOVA, the question of testing for PEDs and doping hit a snag in 2014, when a female sprinter was found to naturally produce more testosterone than her competitors. This article addresses the difference between natural advantages and artificial ones.

contemplate

Who created this message?

What kind of “text” is it?
How similar or different is it to others of the same genre?
What are the various elements (building blocks) that make up the whole?

What creative techniques are used to attract my attention?

What do you notice (about the way the message is constructed)?
What’s the emotional appeal?
What makes it seem “real?”
What's the emotional appeal? Persuasive devices used?

How might different people understand this message differently from me?

How many other interpretations could there be?
How could we hear about them?
How can you explain the different responses?

What lifestyles, values, and points of view are represented in, or omitted from, this message?

What type of person is the reader/watcher/listener invited to identify with?
What ideas or perspectives are left out?
How would you find what’s missing?
What judgments or statements are made about how we treat other people?

Why is this message being sent?

What's being sold in this message? What's being told?
Who is served by or benefits from the message
– the public?
– private interests?
– individuals?
– institutions?

debate